Currency of Stability or Colonial Relic? The CFA Franc and the Debate Over Monetary Sovereignty

For over 75 years, a unique and deeply polarizing currency has circulated through the markets of Central and West Africa. From the bustling ports of Abidjan to the oil fields of Libreville, the CFA franc determines the price of bread, the value of labor, and the cost of imports for over 160 million people.

To some economists, it is a pillar of stability in a volatile region. To others, it is a humiliating remnant of the colonial era that stifles economic growth. At the heart of this divide lies the debate over monetary sovereignty—a struggle to determine whether financial independence is worth the price of potential economic instability.

Related: Cameroon’s Digital Marketplace and E-commerce Growth

What is the CFA Franc?

The CFA franc is not actually one currency, but two distinct currencies used in two different economic zones. While they have the same value and are both pegged to the Euro, they are not interchangeable:

1. West African CFA Franc (XOF): Used by the eight members of the West African Economic and Monetary Union (UEMOA)—Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, Guinea-Bissau, Mali, Niger, Senegal, and Togo.
2. Central African CFA Franc (XAF): Used by the six members of the Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC)—Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, and Gabon.

The Architecture of Dependence: How it Works

To understand why the debate over monetary sovereignty is so heated, one must understand the mechanics of the currency. The CFA franc operates on four fundamental principles established with the French Treasury:

• Fixed Parity: The value of the CFA franc is pegged to the Euro (formerly the French Franc). At the time this article was written, 1 Euro equals 655.957 CFA francs.
• Convertibility Guarantee: The French Treasury guarantees that the CFA franc can be converted into foreign currency at any time.
• Free Transferability: Capital can flow freely within the zone and to France (though capital controls exist for other countries).
• Centralization of Reserves: This is the most contentious point. Historically, African central banks were required to deposit 50% of their foreign exchange reserves into an “operating account” at the French Treasury.

The Argument for Stability: Why it Survives

Proponents of the CFA franc, including the IMF and various credit rating agencies, argue that the currency has shielded member nations from the hyperinflation and currency collapses seen in neighboring countries like Ghana or Nigeria.

• Low Inflation: Because the currency is tethered to the Euro, CFA zone countries generally enjoy low and stable inflation rates, protecting the purchasing power of the poor.
• Macroeconomic Discipline: The strict rules of the monetary union prevent governments from simply printing money to pay off debts, encouraging fiscal responsibility.
• Attractiveness to Investors: Foreign investors generally prefer stable currencies where they don’t have to worry about their assets losing 50% of their value overnight due to a sudden devaluation.

The Case Against: The Chains of the Past

However, a growing chorus of Pan-Africanists, economists, and young activists argues that these benefits come at a steep cost. They assert that true independence is impossible without control over one’s own money.

1. The “Colonial Tax” Perception

The requirement to keep foreign reserves in France is often viewed as a tax on African wealth. While these funds do earn interest, critics argue that African nations are essentially lending money to France at low rates while borrowing money from international markets at high rates.

2. Stifled Industrialization

Because the CFA franc is pegged to the Euro—a very strong currency—exports from African nations are relatively expensive. This makes it difficult for local African manufacturers to compete globally. This phenomenon, known as “Dutch Disease,” encourages nations to rely on exporting raw materials (like cocoa or oil) rather than developing their own industries.

3. Credit Rationing

To maintain the strict ratio required to back the currency, central banks in the CFA zones often restrict credit. This results in high interest rates for local businesses. In a region desperate for entrepreneurship, access to capital is throttled to protect the currency peg.

Ultimately, this side of the argument suggests that the debate over monetary sovereignty is not just about economics; it is about dignity. As long as monetary policy is effectively outsourced to Europe, decolonization remains incomplete.

The Winds of Change: The “Eco” and Reform

Recognizing the toxic symbolism of the CFA franc, significant changes have begun. In 2019, reforms were announced for the West African zone (UEMOA):

• Name Change: The currency is slated to be renamed the “Eco.”
• End of Reserve Deposits: The requirement to deposit 50% of reserves with the French Treasury has been scrapped.
• French Exit: French representatives are being removed from the board of the Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO).

However, many activists argue these changes are merely cosmetic. The peg to the Euro remains, meaning the monetary policy will still be dictated by the European Central Bank in Frankfurt, rather than by the specific needs of African economies.

Conclusion: A Delicate Transition

The transition away from the CFA franc is fraught with risk. A poorly managed exit could lead to capital flight, massive devaluation, and a spike in the cost of living. Yet, the status quo is becoming politically untenable.

As a new generation of African leaders rises, the debate over monetary sovereignty will likely move from theoretical discussions to concrete policy. The challenge will be to sever the colonial umbilical cord without cutting off the lifeline of economic stability.